Quote:
Originally Posted by AHGONG
 hmm... interesting maybe we should exchange our interest in gals... me taking the tall ones n u taking the petit n cute ones....hahaha....sorry was bz last week so unable to attend your outings cheers....... |
Bro ahgong, I see that you are another fan of the ‘tall ones’. I am sure that there will be a fairly long queue should Bro Warbird decide to ‘discard’ his tall ones. Now that I know Bro Warbird’s and my tastes are relatively similar, you can count on me being part of the queue.
I have yet to date a PRC mei who is taller than me. I recently met a girl who is 1.78m from Beijing at one of the pubs in TP. Pity about her face, just missed the grade by “that much” on my personal aesthetic scale. But what the heck, I may be just willing to forego some points in the aesthetics department for height.
Quote:
Originally Posted by warbird
......I leave no stone unturned. I may not hv time for any new chio gals now, but I'll keep their ctc FFR (for future reference,) hahaha.
Actually, the absolute height is unimportant, it's a gal's facial beauty, cuteness, balanced n proportionate head/neck/body/limbs/bony frame n personality that truly matter...
|
Sometimes consolidation is good. Look at what you have presently have before endeavoring the new.
That being said, do leave a space in your FFR pagebook for M’s younger sister. She is rather short, but everything is quite proportional in the “limbs/torso/legs/neck/head” ratio. The only thing disproportional is the size of the protrusions i.e. mammary glands vis-à-vis the overall size! She is a tit-lovers’ dream girl.
Will go for a short biz trip to Malaysia for a while and then be back on Tuesday nite or Wed morning in your 'no stone unturn' quest of mei nu.
Quote:
Originally Posted by =LatexDolly=
Ah, beautiful ideas and thoughts I wish I can afford. The definition of "soul mate" cannot be put more aptly by anyone else than bro Warbird. Perhaps it can be everlasting. But ironically, only in Death.
Through Death, a moment in time is frozen and immortalised for all of eternity. And what the both of you have at the moment you both perish, you hold in your soul till the end of time and what you have can no longer be transient. Death has conquered Time for the both of you and preserved your entwined souls in all its entirety and perfection. What you possess will be something far greater than Love.
And that in itself is my only reason for staying alive.... to seek my other half. The desire, the yearning to be whole and completed....
|
You are indeed a romantic soul Lady LD!
Despite the hard core reality paradigm that I generally operate on, at the back of my mind, I guess there is a longing for a twin flame/soul etc. I will attempt to explain why there is such a longing for a soul mate. People mostly use this term whilst talking about religion, but for me it is equally applicable to the love context too – especially when it comes to the notion of having a soul mate:
The term I allude to above is ‘existential loneliness’. It is a complicated philosophical construct to be expatiating on in the context of this forum. For now, we can just take it to mean that in the mere act of living, no one can really understand the recesses of your soul (to fully 100% understand nad apprehend you as an essence, your longings, your thoughts etc). Everyone is thus alone in this sense. No one else can enter your internal world so to speak.
As a result of this 'alone-ness', we as sentient beings create (some like to use the word “reify”) a construct/entity as a perfect being in the realm of “thoughts” so that we can pour out our deepest longing onto this construct / reified being.
In short, the notion of soul mate is an internal communication with oneself through a reified construct. (Hope not to “cheem” for most readers!)
Moving down a little from highfalutin theorizing:
1) I do share Bro Warbird’s notion that in the world of impermanence an everlasting love (that transcends time/lifespan) is a misnomer. Your life’s construct, your worldview, you love paradigm is constantly in a state of flux. Hence the likelihood of finding that perfect individual only exists in theory and not in real life per se.
(Personification of soulmate as a perfect being is but an “ideal type” – philosophers and social theorist reading here will no doubt recognize the term and appreciate what I am talking about above).
2) I shall ask the obvious: Why is there an inherent “monogamous” bias when talking about the twin flame/soul mate? Can you not have a multiplicity of soul mates? In fact the latter makes more sense; we are more likely to find compatible attributes in many different individuals rather than all compatible attribute in a single person/individual.
3) Hypothetically if such a soul mate exists – and the desire and longing to meet is so strong – the more germane question to ask is: what are the steps you take to make sure you meet him/her.
(Or do you expect that the Great Universe (or God) to arrange for fate to arrange serendipitous moments for you to meet him/her).
4) Speaking of the metaphysical, I shall just leave an open ended topic of discussion: How does the notion of the soul mate relate and interplay with related concepts such near death experience / reincarnation / afterlife? Afterall, the very term ‘soul’ has a “beyond this lifetime” connotation.
I have lots to write on the above but will desist. Don’t want to detract this thread of its reality element which is so evident. Theorizing / Philosophizing generally does not generate much interest in this forum, so I shall stop here.
Cheers all!